Adobe ocr software that reads numbers from photos

#ADOBE OCR SOFTWARE THAT READS NUMBERS FROM PHOTOS HOW TO#
#ADOBE OCR SOFTWARE THAT READS NUMBERS FROM PHOTOS PDF#
#ADOBE OCR SOFTWARE THAT READS NUMBERS FROM PHOTOS PRO#

Even better, if you have the original paper, I would suggest totally rescanning at 600 dpi into lossless TIFF format and for pages with issues, doing some edits in Photoshop.

#ADOBE OCR SOFTWARE THAT READS NUMBERS FROM PHOTOS PDF#

However, if there is a way for you to get the original scan images and ascertain whether they are significantly higher resolution (and preferably notВ JPEG), I would suggest creating a PDF file directly from such images and trying OCR in Acrobat from there. You absolutely don't want JPEG or even JPEG2000 for this purpose. Always us the High fidelityВ resolution setting:ДЇurthermore, use Acrobat's Save as Adobe PDFВ PDFMaker facility to create PDF from Word, not Microsoft's! Create special options that result in images notВ being downsampled and ZIP-compressed within the PDF file. Microsoft Word has preferences as to what resolution to store placed images at. That is probably the source of the images being 200-225 dpi and in fuzzy-wuzzy JPEG format. I strongly endorse the response from goes under GIGO, garbage in, garbage out! The original document appears to have been printed on a daisywheel, dot matrix, or low resolution inkjet printer typical of the time period (1981) and then photocopied!ДЇurther analyzing the PDF file provided, to make matters worse, it appears to be a PDF file created by placing images into a Microsoft Word document and using Microsoft's own PDF creation which is notoriously problematic. But it got done.ДЄnyhow, here's the blog, I hope you get something from it.

On my previous scale of 1-10, I'd have given that scan about a 3 because the original had pencil scribbles, the patten on the typewriter was causing slipping so some text was at an angle, there were lots of pencil corrections, it was a mess. FWIW, several years ago I found a family history that my mom wrote MANY years ago, scanned it, OCRed it, and then brought it into Word for correction. the one big advantage you have with this document is that the formatting is very straightforward and will not be affected by the exporting to Word by any degree. Word has a variety of features that are significantly better than what Acrobat has for correcting an OCR document. One thing I can suggest is that you take the end result of what you're getting with this and export it into a Word document and do the text corrrection in Word. It might give you some ideas to work with to get a better quality end result.

#ADOBE OCR SOFTWARE THAT READS NUMBERS FROM PHOTOS HOW TO#

If not I'd be astounded, but it all depends upon someone high up to say 'Hey, we should look into this.' But until that time, we have what we have.ДЄ number of years ago I did a blog for Adobe on how to get a cleaner scan and wrote the following. But I do wonder if ANY company is starting to utilize AI to increase the quality of OCR. I do know that Adobe does not make it's own OCR engine, they rent it from another company (at this moment I can't remember which one, sorry). It's in the early stage right now but does show a lot of promise. I do not know if you follow Photoshop at all but they are investing a lot of time and money in using AI to do some enhanced enhancements. What I have to think about is the current software trend using AI to better think out what could/should be taking place. Now, on the other hand, why isn't it any better. So, in a nutshell, what I'm seeing with the results are about on par with the quality of the original scan for this PDF.

That can screw up an OCR process as well. Don't know why but it just seems that that's an issue for it.ДЄnother issue with the scan is the bleeding from the back (or ghosting of text on the backside). The size of the font is OK but for some reason, it's been my experience that Acrobat's OCR has problems with Courier.

However, there is a fusyness to the quality of the scan that makes me think this was a photocopy before it was scanned, that's a big trench. The scan appears to have been done about 200-225 ppi (300 ppi is considered minimum and 600 ppi is ideal). On a scale of 1-10, I'd call this a 6+ and the results are about the same. It is absolutely no different when scanning: the more you do at the time of scanning the better the OCR results will be. Achieving good OCR is like taking great photos: the more you do in camera and the less you do in Photoshop, the better the image is going to be. I've seen worse, much worse, but this was not good to begin with. Now please read all of this becuase first I'm going to disagree with you and then mostly agree with you.ДЇirst off the quality of the original scan was fairly dreadful. To be honest, I found the results no worse than I was expecting when I saw the quality of the copy that you were working on.

#ADOBE OCR SOFTWARE THAT READS NUMBERS FROM PHOTOS PRO#

I did download it and I did run it through my copy of Acrobat Pro DC, and like you, did get dreadful results. Thank you for supplying the document that you were working on, it was very helpful.

Adobe ocr software that reads numbers from photos